March 9, 2011 Ex Mujica adviser, was "corruption" if Fripur Dinara. Former director accused of hiding irregularities "I doubted whether it was failure or corruption. I'm sure it was this latter," said Fabiana Terrenoire
-ex-adviser to José Mujica on illegal repackaging of products in the Dinara Fripur not investigated. Justice investigates itself. In December last year, said Terrenoire and provided information to Judge Graciela Gatti organized crime and the prosecutor Ricardo Perciballe, compared to that between November 2007 and July 2008 Fripur changed the expiration date from their packaging and exported when he resumed sales to Europe. The European Union closed during those months its market for Uruguay due to health problems in some plants, especially the Fripur. Terrenoire, who advised José Mujica on fisheries for its passage by the Senate and the Ministry of Livestock, which was denied by the president in a note presented to Justice, but confirmed by several sources, "said El Pais that the former director of the Directorate of Aquatic Resources (Dinara) Daniel Montiel "was aware of a crime and hid it in time to investigate."
"I have nothing against Montiel, but pledged to start MPP heads when irregularities occur, this is serious and nothing was done, "said Terrenoire to El Pais.
" This documentation shows an irregularity which was not investigated,
is not ineptitude but
corruption, "he added Terrenoire.
Montiel-current coordinator of the bench of MPP in parliament it was "neither desirable nor appropriate" to comment before the court ruling, so he told El Pais that maintain "responsible silence", but after the Justice issue, give all necessary explanations.
repacking. In June 2008, an inspector for the Dinara warned his superiors of a "succession irregularities which are found every day in the company Fripur SA.
irregularities concerned the repackaging of goods destined for the European Union, with changes in their original packaging date made in the fish processing plant Fripur, Gap reported . The officer was transferred to another destination and address of the Dinara-then by Montiel - did not investigate or punish the firm for these acts, the weekly added.
This issue is investigated by the court for organized crime directed by Gatti, who analyzes whether Fripur committed a crime and whether the company was benefited by the government.
During the election campaign and after it became public knowledge the support of the owners of Fripur Mujica, both the contribution of funds and the loan of an aircraft owned The prosecutor specializing in organized crime Ricardo Perciballe, Gatti asked the judge to inquire Fripur this alleged irregularity.
Decree 213 of 1997 regulates fishing in Uruguay. Defines economic fraud as "deception of the recipient or consumer of fishery products by irregular labeling, as a declaration of species, product, ingredients, net weight, etc ".
The decree states that" the information that looks at the tags or labels should not mislead or deceive the consumer "and that" packages of fishery products which have been repacked shall be marked with the initial code to which you add the letter R ".
The operation detected by the inspector, and denounced by Terrenoire before the court on racketeering, repackaged brand Fripur without adding the letter R, breached the code of origin of goods and even developed codes used (ie dates after packaging).
In 2006, the Ministry of Defense (represented by the National Board of Health of the Armed Forces), Ministry of Economy (represented by the Centralized Procurement Unit Food UCAA) and the Ministry of Livestock (represented by the Dinara) agreed and wrote a manual of procedures required for the acquisition of the UCAA.
This manual, which on behalf of MGAP was conducted by Montiel, contains much of Decree 213, including financial fraud.
Fripur issued a statement in the press, which claims to be victim of a "strong media campaign." Warns that "those who irresponsibly lend credence to slander affecting goods and high values \u200b\u200bat stake, should take responsibility in the areas that correspond to their words and attitudes. "
D
esarchivan case on the relationship Mujica-Fripur
Paul Melendrez
Justice reopen an inquiry into the
links Fripur SA José Mujica and
. and whether that influenced a fine of only 100 UR that was imposed on the company, if the penalty could reach the 5,000 UR.
The prosecutor specializing in organized crime Ricardo Perciballe , asked Judge Graciela Gatti
the unzip of a complaint he had filed in February, the attorney Gustavo Salle asking them to investigate the economic contributions that made the owner of the fish processing company Fripur SA, Alberto Fernández
for acts of ownership of José Mujica last March 1.
A Perciballe instances, the case was closed because it considered that there was no evidence to warrant an investigation. However, in a request by the complainant, the prosecutor requested the case be reopened yesterday, as he knew the country.
Earlier this month, and based on information reported by El Pais and the weekly search-Salle claimed to reopen the case after it became known publicly that the National Directorate of Aquatic Resources (Dinara) Fripur SA imposed a fine of 100 adjustable units (UR) which amount to approximately $ 46,000.
In 2007, a series of irregularities in the fish processing company, led the European Union to temporarily close the entrance of Uruguayan fishery products, causing losses of U.S. $ 80 million to the local market.
In the opinion presented yesterday before Judge Gatti, called the subpoenas Perciballe holder Dinara, Daniel Gilardoni
, and Fabiana
Terrenoire
, a former adviser Mujica said that there are serious irregularities in the body the Ministry of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries.
"outrageous."
Terrenoire
, who advised Mujica in fisheries during his terms as legislator and as Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries, said days ago that the fine imposed on Fripur SA "is outrageous so low." Terrenoire told El Pais in its issue of May 7 that "it is outrageous that a businessman, after laboratory results detected the presence of cadmium (metal toxicity and cancer risk) and high counts of fecal coliforms and enterobacteria in their products, receive 100 UR fine "when applying the maximum is 5,000 UR said. IF Fripur
, AND FRIENDSHIP OF THE EMPLOYER
MUJICA FERNÁNDEZ
26 May 2010 ... VI) According emerge evidence in the car, Mr Alberto Fernández
, owner of
Fripur
SA, after the events described,
..
Inspectors had requested the maximum penalty for Fripur
Report. Weeks of "intentional omissions"
MGAP legal services applied to a minimum fine for fishing Fripur sanitary irregularities. However, a report of who inspected the company recommended a "maximum amount of exemplary punishment." In November 2007, the European Union temporarily suspended imports of processed fish in Uruguay due to its technical irregularities found in plants of the country, including that of Fripur-the largest-and losses for the country determined the order of $ 80 million. Previously, two reports of inspection by officers of the National Directorate of Aquatic Resources (Dinara) July 24 and Aug. 10 were aware of serious flaws in the plant health of the firm. After almost three years of these inspections, the Ministry of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries (MGAP) decided to sanction the company by a fine of 100 adjustable units (about $ 46,000), when the maximum possible penalty of 5,000 RU ($ 2,310 .000). The current regulations stipulate that, before considering the gravity of the infringement, the legal services of advice collected MGAP technical services of Dinara. Ads by Google The report was written in 2009 by one of the inspectors who carved Fripur records in 2007. The letter, whose text agreed the country, said that "intentional omissions of the company lasted for weeks, therefore corresponds to a maximum amount of exemplary punishment." It adds that "with his actions, the company put at risk to consumers of their products and endangered exports to markets of maximum value to the economic interests of the country (European Union, Russian Federation, for example)."
The amount of the penalty determined the reopening of a case file referred to the links between President José Mujica and Fripur owner, Alberto Fernández. The attorney Gustavo Salle was the one who filed the complaint and now sought the reopening of the case, they did place the prosecutor and the presiding judge, Ricardo Perciballe and Graciela Gatti. During the election campaign, used the plane Mujica Fernandez, who also paid his presidential sash and collaborated with $ 15,000 for the artistic part of the act of taking Mujica of the March 1 Independence Plaza. without washing. Dinara coach said in his report that Fripur inspections in 2007 found that staff entered the processing plant without hands or boots were washed and masonry. The official says that "committing a error" when placing an offense when they are actually two, which "minimizes the seriousness of the offense" and promotes the lack of corrective actions.adds that "the situation further deteriorates, because the company refused to consider corrective actions required inspectors "in 2007 and were reported to the head of quality control Fripur. It adds that it is a misdemeanor cataloged error that is serious," as it could affect public health.
P
irregularities had been reported twice by inspectors from the National Directorate of Aquatic Resources. Given the seriousness of the case, the technicians advised Fripur fined the maximum amount possible: about $ 115,000.
Dinara
But nothing was done until the European sanction.
Nearly three years after the complaint of how and when exports had been resumed, the Uruguayan government in just Fripur fined $ 2,300 (46,000 pesos), a figure 50 times lower than that recommended by the technicians and 34,782 times smaller than the money, said
El Pais, Uruguay lost because of the company: $ 80 million.
The case was brought to court by the attorney Gustavo Salle.
, the inspector who found the new irregular Fripur-thanks to which Uruguay had beaten-exported fish was removed from his job, removed from office, for a less embarrassing tasks in the port Montevideo, certainly far removed from friends of the president.
Friday, May 28, 2010
Tais Araujo And Reynaldo Gianecchini
so virulently attacked, Artigas Barrios went on repair their wounded pride.
said "it is reducing the level of the political campaign instead of raising the voltage of the proposals." He said that "the fee received by the Municipality is 40,000 not $ 70,000 but" he not be unlawful for Mr. Juan Vergara "explode the camp by a corporation, and is willing to respond to the courts if there was an investigation.